The EPA is supposed to be a shining example of benevolent scientific dictatorship. Without the experts at the EPA, we would all poison one another. But now that the EPA is here, we are all safe.
But it doesn’t quite work that way.
Despite recruiting scientists to advocate the politically-decided message and despite cherry-picking which scientists to acknowledge, the EPA’s passion for ruling “policymaking” outstrips their ability to rationalize those rules.
Seven months after being subpoenaed by Congress, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Gina McCarthy conceded that her agency does not have – and cannot produce – all of the scientific data used for decades to justify numerous rules and regulations under the Clean Air Act.
Post Continues on politicaloutcast.com ...