If Obama Sends Police to Come for Your Guns, Will That Trigger 'Civil War?'


Everyone of you is going to have to make a decision. Obama is moving to become a dictator. In order to do that, Americans must be disarmed. Our government is preparing legislation to have firm arms confiscated beginning with semi-automatic rifles and military grade hand guns. I’m asking you to become public and vocal. I’m asking you to publicly state with me that IF anyone in any level of government uses physical force to remove our firearms, that you execute them as terrorists who are trying to overthrow our form of government and turn America into a police state modeled after Nazi Germany and Communist Russia. In this video I’m going to lay out the historical facts that show where are county is headed. Specifically, I’m going to compare the United States to the rise and fall of Nazi Germany so you can the undeniable comparisons.




Post Continues on beforeitsnews.com





Posted in 2nd Amendment Tagged with: ,
125 comments on “If Obama Sends Police to Come for Your Guns, Will That Trigger 'Civil War?'
  1. Friscolady says:

    No body can say it better than the Founders:

    “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free
    State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be
    infringed.”

    So I don’t suggest anyone trying to take away firearms from any one – for those that decide to resist – are in truth defending the Constitution and Bill of Rights as the Founders meant us to do.

    When you heart grows faint remember the sacrifice those men that wrote the Constitution and Bill of Rights made in the founding of this country!

    Remember Lexingtion and Concord!

    • spidermike says:

      “The conclusion is thus inescapable that the history, concept, and wording of the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, as well as its interpretation by every major commentator and court in the first half-century after its ratification, indicates that what is protected is an individual right of a private citizen to own and carry firearms in a peaceful manner.”

      Report of the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, 97th Congress, Second Session (February 1982)

    • DrSique says:

      It can be made clearer because far too many Americans believe that their right to bear arms comes from the Second Amendment. Our Founders were clear that the right to self defense is a right granted by God and cannot be removed by a lower power, such as government. The Constitution merely recognizes rights that already exist and states that those God given rights must never be interfered with by government. I agree with the author that “We the People” must be clear and unified that any attempt to enslave us will be met with the strongest resistance at our disposal.

      • Sandra Lee Smith says:

        THAT was made clear in the Declaration, which the Constitution was written to GUARANTEE; not define the rights within. Falls under the “right to liberty”.

      • ecoplastican says:

        What happens when our government is against God – anti-Christian?
        This government is destructive.

    • don says:

      only a little more. from time to time the tree of liberty must be refrested with the blood of patirots an tyrances .freedom is NOT freed

    • amen, our forefathers are turning in their graves that we have allowed it to get this far. The crazies are out and about and now we can’t ignore them. They have become the parents to our children, they tell us what to eat, and they want to provide everything. Don’t want them in my life I have done pretty well so far without government telling me what to do when to do it and how to do it. They are inept.

  2. Dog says:

    Phuck gun grabbers

  3. suz says:

    I’m glad Ted Nugent is on our side. He says it like it is.

  4. PatrioTom says:

    Molon Labe……but BYOBB! (Bring Your Own Body Bags)

  5. Ann Rand says:

    What do you think?

  6. brabbie2002 says:

    I still am amazed that he thinks the armed forces will back him on his plans. Have any of you heard any member of the armed services stating he would follow the orders of this Hitleresque douche bag?

    • Brenda says:

      Why are you amazed? Many of the soilders in Germany were not pleased with Hitler’s actions, bu they followed orders. Look at the number of those tried at Neuenburg, their defense was “I was ordered”. Short of a military rebellion against presidential orders, they will do as “ordered”. Case in point: EO ordering Chaplins to conduct same sex marriages. Battlefield reading ot Maranda act to prisoners of war. drone use in war arenas now available to city police forces, and many others.

      • RobinPC says:

        Brenda, sadly you are correct about following orders. So, that means when our son, cousin, daughter knocks on the door (I don’t think it will work that way, see my other post) but should it be that way, how many law abiding citizens are willing to open up on their children, or friends? I think very few. For a civil war to even think about starting, there needs to be an organized resistance made up of groups, not individuals. For example, one person would say, you are not getting my guns – bang ok, now bury him. But an organized resistance would be far more effective, but this will not happen as at the first sign of a resistance the govt will eradicate those people as terrorists. Hitler and Stalin did exactly that. I have said many times that I will give up my gun when they pry my cold dead fingers from the grip. However if it is my grandchild serving in the Army at this time standing at the front door, I am not sure I would shoot him so I can keep my gun. I probably would not shoot him, but instead give up my gun. Blood is thicker than steel. It is a very complex problem, our rights vs. tyranity. As long as people like Feinestein are in office and insist upon shreading the Constitution, sooner or later the entire document will be something found in a history book (maybe) as it will no longer apply. When our founding fathers fought a war to keep us free, the entire situation was a lot “smaller”. People were of the same mind and willing to die for freedom. Today the logistics are miuch greater, people are no longer of the same mind, there are no “uniforms” to be seen between liberals and real people. It is a very sad situation. Maybe someone has a plan? It is a shame that a deranged person would shoot children instead of criminal politicians!

        • armyvet says:

          The difference between “then” and now, is that so many today have not seen tyranny first hand. They seem to think that this country is immune to it–that it can’t happen here. They are wrong on both counts. It has happened in every country where individuals are denied weapons. This is the only reason this country is still free. (?)

      • NT says:

        Read the following and learn about YOUR military.

        The wordings of the current oath of enlistment and
        oath for commissioned officers are as follows:

        “I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support
        and defend the Constitution of the United States against all
        enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and
        allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the
        President of the United States and the orders of the officers
        appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform
        Code of Military Justice. So help me God.” (Title 10, US Code;
        Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789,
        with amendment effective 5 October 1962).

        “I, _____ (SSAN), having
        been appointed an officer in the Army
        of the United States, as indicated above in the grade
        of _____
        do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and
        defend
        the Constitution of the United States against all
        enemies, foreign
        and domestic, that I will bear true faith and
        allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any
        mental
        reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will
        well and
        faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon
        which I am
        about to enter; So help me God.” (DA Form 71, 1 August
        1959,
        for officers.)

        • DrSique says:

          I would recommend that anyone concerned about our military visit the Oath Keepers website. Most officers, current and retired, are studied in history and the Constitution and will act accordingly. I have far more faith in those who were educated at West Point than the pack of Ivy
          League educated elitists occupying Washington.

        • Brenda says:

          I have read the oaths and my father was in the Army for 31 years. Now, tell me truthfully, will you follow order by the president after he declares martial law and names those unwilling to surrender their guns terrorist, or will you stand by your oath to protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies.
          The commissioned officers oath contain the clause “obey the orders of the President of the United States and the Officers appointed over me.” Who will they give preference too, the Officers or the President?
          Sorry, but your oath gives me no confort. There have been too many incursions into the military status quo and too many willingly acquisitioning to his orders to give me any assurance that the military would not blindly follow his orders, even if it amounts to attacking American citizens. Not to mention the mercernary army we now have under various contractors..

        • knowitall says:

          Brenda ,would your daddy shoot you and your mother or grandmother just because obutthead said to ?? I don’t think so ? being an American Vet myself I know firsthand that if this order were to come down the pipe ,that my fellow military partners aren’t going to shoot and kill our own family members and friends and neighbors to steal their guns and help this POS in the whitehouse,that thinks we the people , are going to just roll over and bow to him and his cronies. A mans word to this oath is his strength as a man ,and it states against “ALL” enemies foreign or domestic . That means from the take over of our own country from it’s government too. God Bless All !

        • Brenda` says:

          No because when he was in the Army during WW!! there were no indoctrinated troops serving. Also, many were told an illegal order could be challenged. That all changed after Viet Nam and has steadly grown worse.

        • actually that oath for officers include the words “according to law”

        • don says:

          who you kidding– all our people in congress takes same oath. yes even obama don’t bother them to break it what make you think the army want? i’m lisenting

        • sorry you are missing a few words. “according to law”

        • yea i took that oath and the word LAWFUL was in front of the word orders

      • fliteking says:

        Solid points made by Brenda.

        There has been a steady and ongoing process of grooming the Military and many do not want to loose pensions and or prestige.

        Do I think some would act against citizens? Yes. I also think those who would not follow orders would be rapidly replaced.

        • PISSED OFF PATRIOT says:

          I disagree the bulk of the actual fighting force in the military are short timers so pensions wont be a factor, the pension brigade ones are usually over weight pencil pushers that havn’t touched a gun since basic training. and most of the young guys that do the actual fighting are from rural areas so I wouldn’t be concerned about them siding with the established military that wont happen, Obama doesn’t have the balls to push this he knows if you open this can of worms there’s no going back, and that all hell will break loose, I hope this doesn’t happen but will see what happens time will tell.

        • fliteking says:

          Hope you are right.

      • Dan says:

        While the Germans were winning it was ok. It was not bad until things turned against the Germans . Many were forced to fight. What other choice was there.

        • Brenda says:

          While the Germans were winning it was ok!!! No it was not the fact that the Germans were winning, it was that too many nations, America and others were to cowardly to commit to war until it came to their own back yard.

    • Remington 870 says:

      As a former viet vet, soldiers follow orders, especially the black soldiers. I never trusted them in 1968-1971, and neither did other white soldiers. That is the way it was them. Can’t speak for today. We are in big trouble folks, and the enemy is in the White House not in the jungle or the desert.

      • fliteking says:

        I’d say a full 50% of the guys I served with from late ’70′s to early 80′s would gladly follow any order to get them ahead or keep them in good graces.

        • Remington 870 says:

          Remember the Kent State shootings? Army National Guardsmen fired on students killing several and wounding many. And, the students were demonstrating against the Vietnam War.

        • Evermyrtle says:

          We had one of those in SC, also, For days the men from the school would stand beside the road and any white person in a car pass by, they would throw rocks and stones at their cars. Much damage and accidents was the result with many people injured. Finally the police intervened with four dead college students as the result.We have something like a festival each year commemorating the event. We have a big write up every year in the news papers but only from the side of the college. The stoning of cars is never mentioned. We are afraid of the results if all of the truth is revealed. I was there and was ordered by my husband, to take other routes to get where I needed to be, “Do not drive down that street.”

        • Remington 870 says:

          Those days may return and this time we must not tip toe around the tulips and be afraid of being called racists. The Black Plague is upon us.

      • Michael G. says:

        And I keep saying: “Look to your front! Mark your target when he comes!”
        I don’t need to say anything else.

        • Remington 870 says:

          Am former infantry…not that I am an expert in anything, but go back to my training and experience as ‘markers’ for two legged targets.

      • You are so right about the enemy in the White House. We took an oath to defend our Constitution against all enemies both foreign and domestic. We never in our wildest dreams thought our number one domestic enemy would be the imposter in the Oval Office. He needs to be thrown out or over run… When he sends his Brown Shirts to take our weapons the fight will begin…. This whole administration is over run with communists that have only one agenda and that is to take total control of this country… They know they have to disarm us first so be prepared, it is coming…..

      • Mark Hatzi says:

        yeah agree, but wouldn’t you rather do Search and Destroy in a jungle rather then house to house, I know which would be my choice…

        • Remington 870 says:

          The jungle is my choice. More places to ambush or take cover. If you were to have told me 40 years ago, there would be a communist in the White House, I would have thought you nuts. We are in big trouble.

    • merryinfidel says:

      I’m retired Army. Trust me. The majority of them will follow orders…

  7. jerryhulick says:

    Yup, it sure will. the Constitution gave us that “right” and the law abiding citizen is dman well prepared to protect it. If not just think of Pre-=war Germany or even russia. Guns were confiscated and the nation ceased to exist. And this burr head is prepared to follow in the foot steps of those great leaders who now dead.

    • JLH says:

      No sir. God Almighty gave you that right. The Constitution simply protects the right. This is why we Veterans swore our Oath to defend the Constitution, not the seated government. Semper Fi

      • DrSique says:

        Oath Keeper JLH??? I certainly hope, and believe, that there are millions like you.

        • PISSED OFF PATRIOT says:

          join Oathkeepers ASAP

        • Friscolady says:

          Love the Oath Keepers and though neither Hubby or I are currently active members, we are 100% in agreement with their mission statement!

          If you can as Pissed Off Patriot said join ASAP!

  8. Liberty Rock says:

    Unfortunately, taking guns away from good Ameticans will triggered off an all out. War against the Tyrany Government.
    People will never surrender their freedom & guns & The Constitution.

    • Remington 870 says:

      I plan to make some widows and orphans when Obama Negro Nazis show up at my front door. We the gun owner have two choices…1. Comply with the Nazis or 2. Make em bleed. If enough of them and us bleed, we may get our country back from the negros and illegals.

      • spidermike says:

        We’ll have enough notice to react. Should anyone come to your door, insist on a search warrant. Have one “throw away gun” to give up only after light resistance. The rest will be buried off your property. There will be blood but only after we organize. We won’t know initially who to trust. Time will tell. Learn how the French resistance to the Nazis organized. The Viet Cong initially used the same structure to great effect. I personally don’t think it will come to that. They will try many avenues first. If Obama is able to hand pick his successor as Putin did, then we are in real trouble. That will be your signal to begin “operations”. It’s “fun” to war game this out but again, I don’t think it will come close to being necessary to take action. All emails and postings like we are doing now are being recorded, be careful. Also, do not assume the military and police will not follow orders. The majority of the rank and file will. That’s how they are trained. They will be told that gun owners are “domestic enemies” and they are sworn to oppose that segment of the public.

        • T says:

          I understand, but must take issue with some of your post. When it comes to the military and police I have to disagree. They have sworn an oath to the US Constitution and I pray it will be honored by such fine men and women. I know I will honor the oath I took to the US Constitution!
          As for warrants, if it comes that far can you honestly believe in your heart that they will have warrants? I believe if the 2nd Amendment falls then all others will no longer matter as the 2nd is there to protect the rest.
          As a nation we are faultering and must put a stop to these attacks against our freedoms and the attacks on the Constitution.
          I hope that this nation does not find it repeating itself in a civil war with American blood being shed. But in times such as these we also must understand anything is possible as stranger things have happened. It never hurts to prepare for the worst and hope for the best. You sound like a great American but seem to be to optomistic my friend. Are we being watched? Without a doubt we are and maybe that is what is scaring the hell out of them to make such a move. A threat of an “assault weapons ban” has only resulted in more Patriot Americans buying up such weapons. Poor planning on the governments part. Take mine, NEVER. GOD bless America and her Patriots.

        • NO ONE i know who serves or HAS served in the military would fire on an AMERICAN PATRIOT. they r NOT protecting the GOVERNMENT. they r protecting & defending THE CONSTITUTION. THAT is the oath. yea i took it. ALSO, since vietnam we r swear to follow all LAWFUL orders.

      • Dan says:

        Don’t forget about the Drones Tanks Bio weapons. When they want u the bad guys will grab you before you know what’s going on. Unless you are a real tuff guy ,after the 1 or 2nd information extraction session you would have given up everyone and everything u know.. You want to come out on top make a plan . Know your adversary .

    • don says:

      nothing THAT needs to be done is unfortunate.

  9. craig says:

    yes obama would gp to jail for breaking the law

  10. RobinPC says:

    I doubt if they will physically come and knock on your door. Instead they will pass a law stating that all guns be turned in. Of course, most won’t do that. Then the first time there is any cause to be in your home, with or without a warrant, you will be arrested for commiting a crime by simply possessing a firearm. If you actually use your weapon to protect your family, you will still be guilty and probably receive a longer sentence that the criminal you stopped (unless he is 6 feet under). That is the way total gun control works in Europe, but of course criminals pay no attention to it.

    • Sending the government around to collect guns didn’t even work in Afganistan! All the government got were some broken, or out-of-date weapons that didn’t have ammunition, and the good stuff was hidden! That just could work here

      • ah but it DID work in England. yea that’s EXACTLY how they confiscated those guns. their “reasonable cause” will be the fact that gun owners have permits. why do you think to PURCHASE a gun you must FIRST apply for a permit? goes into a database and reported to the FBI. why do you think the UN wants that database? so they know who to target.

  11. Harold says:

    I believe it will lead to civil war, which is exactly what Obamanation wants.

  12. budman says:

    Obama has no idea the can of worms he is opening up and may to his eventual downfall.

  13. TPM4 says:

    they come for my guns that will be the day that i die…along with as many as i can take with me
    i will defend my family, my home and my constitutional rights to the death

    • Michael G. says:

      You can’t give ‘em a break…send ‘em to Hell!

    • don says:

      the chance of us killing many is remote but stand up i will. they will come in the dead of night we will have little chance. but one must stand for something or you will fall for anything whitch many of us have done already.

  14. GRAYDOG says:

    LETS TRY THE MOST LODICAL ANSWER TO THE PROBLEM OF GUN CRIME
    ALLOW ALL OF THE RESPONSIBLE CITIZENS WITH CLEAR RECORDS TO POSESS
    AND TO CARRY A CONCELLED FIREARM , AFTER COMPLETING A FIREARMS SAFETY
    COURSE FROM A LINCESED FIREARMS INSTRUCTOR , AND GO THROUGH A EXTENSIVE FULL BACKGROUND CHECK AND RENEW SUCH PERMIT EVERY 5 YRS.
    IF A CITIZEN IS ARRESTED FOR ANY CRIMINAL ACT , THEREAFTER , THE PERMIT
    WILL BE PULLED , UNTILL FURTHER NOTICE . PERMIT HOLDERS MUST KEEP SAID
    FIREARMS STORED IN A GOOD STRONG STEEL BOX WITH A GOOD STRONG STEEL
    LOCK , WHEN NOT BEING WORN ON HIS PERSON PLEASE TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION ; CRIMINALS DO NOT FOLLOW THE LAW AND WOULD LOVE TO
    SEE OUR GOVERNMENT BAN HANGUNS . THEY WOULD HAVE A FREE REIGN
    OVER THE ENTIRE WORLD . RESPECTFULY MR. K

    • OutdoorFrontiers says:

      That’s not a solution to the problem at all. I am a responsible citizen, I am licensed to carry, I have gone through a firearms safety course from a licensed firearms instructor, I have had the extensive background check and my permit is renewed every five years. But what good are my guns going to do me during a home invasion when they’re locked in a steel box? Am I supposed to shout, “Hey, gimme a minute to get my gun!?”
      As you rightly say, criminals do not follow the law, I have to be ready 24/7, which is why I have a loaded 9mm on the nightstand, a loaded 12 ga. pump alongside it. My wife keeps a loaded .22 handgun on her side of the bed and I have a loaded AR-15 in the rack in my office.
      I am not now, nor have I ever been a criminal, but this government is doing its best to make me one. Should the gun ban laws get passed, I’ll instantly become a criminal when I refuse to turn in my guns.
      The solution is to enforce the existing gun laws, stop plea-bargaining every crime down, stop the early release of violent criminals, execute the murderers and rapists (so we won’t have them repeating their crimes on other victims), stop waiting for the government to solve all our problems, start taking responsibility for our actions and get back to being the country that this once was!

    • don says:

      you just don’t get it do you. they have to disarm us gray dog most of what you said is in fact already the law. .its US with gun they don’t want try agin

  15. gbandy says:

    The answer to the question is YEP!